It is the most famous and popular version of the online game. Classical Zuma will always remain a favorite one for many players. It has beautiful graphics, lots of exciting levels, and a simple and clear system of bonuses. You can open a full screen Zuma Deluxe by clicking on the page. In this case you'll get much more pleasure from the. With over 20 temples to explore and two gameplay modes, Zuma is a non-stop never-ending puzzle challenge. Let the tribal sounds and music surround you.
![Free Free](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Kj_EYI7pYIU/TylTGyf8pxI/AAAAAAAABKs/W9LshXt5Zt4/s1600/Zuma+Deluxe+Free+Games+download.jpg)
![Play Play](/uploads/1/2/5/7/125745667/896271188.jpg)
File is probably clean and detections are a result of sometimes being bundled with adware. As previously explained it was common of the era. These are very likely false positives.
I have uploaded the file to VirusTotal where it is scanned by multiple engines and here are the results:
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/00e99a92e88cc487ccaa2dbee410b23cc6539a3e9bb7d5eb415334d9fa55b783/analysis/1455798371/
Some share a common thread of indicating possible bundled adware; this is usually from engines which are particularly cautious and more likely to throw a false positive (Avira for example) while others are one-off engines.
None of the positive results show anything outright alarming or malicious, but seem to be mundane or generic warnings of PUP/A (potentially unwanted program/application).
While the vast majority of well-known engines indicate it is safe (Kaspersky, Sophos, Symantec, Microsoft, Avast, AVG, BitDefender, TrendMicro, DrWeb etc).
Personally am inclined to believe it is safe, and this is just a false positive by over-zealous scanning engines.
I have uploaded the file to VirusTotal where it is scanned by multiple engines and here are the results:
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/00e99a92e88cc487ccaa2dbee410b23cc6539a3e9bb7d5eb415334d9fa55b783/analysis/1455798371/
Some share a common thread of indicating possible bundled adware; this is usually from engines which are particularly cautious and more likely to throw a false positive (Avira for example) while others are one-off engines.
None of the positive results show anything outright alarming or malicious, but seem to be mundane or generic warnings of PUP/A (potentially unwanted program/application).
While the vast majority of well-known engines indicate it is safe (Kaspersky, Sophos, Symantec, Microsoft, Avast, AVG, BitDefender, TrendMicro, DrWeb etc).
Personally am inclined to believe it is safe, and this is just a false positive by over-zealous scanning engines.